
Ben Affleck's Ethical Approach to AI in Filmmaking

By Roger Ebert


By Roger Ebert
During a recent discussion at Bloomberg's Screentime event, Ben Affleck initially touched upon the incorporation of AI in his new movie, 'Animals.' He acknowledged using AI extensively but expressed a playful reluctance to specify its applications, noting the industry's aim to maintain the illusion of reality. Affleck reassured that despite AI's involvement, 'Animals' remains a deeply human story, suggesting a nuanced and ethical implementation of the technology.
At the film's premiere, Affleck elaborated on his ethical guidelines for AI use, stressing the importance of avoiding copyrighted material or content derived from fellow creators' work. He revealed that a proprietary dataset was developed for 'Animals' to ensure that the AI tools did not infringe upon existing intellectual property, thereby sidestepping extractive practices that could undermine artists' rights.
Affleck firmly rejected the notion of AI as a substitute for human creativity, stating he has no interest in films generated solely by typing commands. He emphasized that the goal is not to create "fake people" or replace anyone but rather to provide a sophisticated post-production tool. He believes that if AI's presence is noticeable or detracts from the film, it indicates a failure in its application, much like a poorly executed visual effect or an unconvincing performance.
Affleck shared his apprehension regarding certain tech companies' handling of image and likeness through AI. He articulated a belief that integrating AI into the hands of experienced filmmakers would lead to superior outcomes. He cited Netflix's willingness to experiment with these discrete AI tools, further validating his thesis that when employed judiciously, AI can genuinely benefit the artistic process. He highlighted that true artistic contribution should be honored and protected, allowing creators to decide if and how AI complements their work.
Affleck also addressed widespread misconceptions about AI, dismissing the idea of it possessing magic, superintelligence, or sentience. He characterized such notions as "old bullshit," predicting that in hindsight, people will view these fears as unfounded, akin to past anxieties about AI leading to scenarios depicted in 'Terminator.' He underscored AI's fundamental limitations, asserting it is a tool, not an autonomous creative entity.
Years prior to the release of 'Animals,' Affleck had been actively involved in the AI sector, notably selling his AI company, InterPositive, to Netflix. He also co-founded Artists Equity with Matt Damon, a company built on the principle of clear and fair compensation for all involved in a production's success. He posited that InterPositive aligns with this philosophy, advocating for a model where artists can leverage AI technologies without compromising their rights or artistic control, ensuring that they are justly rewarded for their contributions.
About the author

Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic whose reviews and essays defined cinema criticism for decades.

by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
by Ta-Nehisi Coates